Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 : Power and Function of Arbitration

Arbitration Act

Power and Function of Arbitration under Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

The UNCITRAL Model Law which changed into handed within the yr of 1985, by using the United Nations Commission on International Trade Law (UNCITRAL), made a substantial contribution in passing The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 in India. While adopting the Model Law, United Nations General Assembly had encouraged that all international locations needed to deliver due consideration to the said Model Law for the purpose of uniformity of the regulation associated with international business arbitration and conciliation. In this regard, India has handed The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996

This Act consolidates all of the laws relating to home arbitration, global arbitration, enforcement of foreign awards in India. The Act also defines the law associated with conciliation and other topics associated therewith. This Act has grown to be very useful for both clients and businesses to ensure cost-powerful solutions to their dispute without any undue postpone and unreasonable harassment. The main cause for the passing of this Act is so that the events emerge as capable to remedy their dispute outside the courtroom inside the presence of an arbitrator appointed via them-self.

Matters coming under the purview of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996
Generally, its miles considered that the matters which may be decided by the civil court docket all come beneath the purview of this Act, however this is not proper. The subjects that are associated with morality, repute, and public regulations are not typically called arbitration. However, the subsequent subjects may be mentioned arbitration:
• Cases related to the unique query of regulation,
• Cases associated with actual ownership of the land,
• Cases associated with damages under any agreement,
• Cases associated with disputes springing up in any agreement,
• Cases underneath which natural query of regulation is bobbing up out of agreement,
• Disputes of regulation and facts,
• Cases associated with winding up of a organization.

Who is an arbitrator?

The arbitrator is a professional who enables the parties in the dispute to arrive on the very last harmonious agreement or settlement. The arbitrator is also called an ‘Umpire’ or ‘referee’.

Appointment of the arbitrator (Section 10 and 11)

Section 10 of this Act affords that parties have the power to decide the variety of arbitrators, but such numbers shall not be an even quantity. However consistent with Section 11, the events are free to decide the process of appointment of arbitrator or arbitrators inside the arbitration settlement however when no such system is decided, then every party is required to hire one arbitrator and the two arbitrators so appointed should ought to rent the third one. If the events fail to employ the arbitrator according to the above process inside 30 days from the date of request made or the arbitrators appointed fail to agree on one character, any party may additionally request the Chief Justice to nominate an arbitrator to them. However, if the events have now not agreed on the procedure of appointing one arbitrator or fails to agree on one character within 30 days from the receipt of a request made by way of any other birthday celebration, the nomination shall be made via the Chief Justice on the request of one of the events. However, where an appointment process has been agreed upon with the aid of the parties, however the events fail to behave as required, a party might also request the Chief Justice to nominate an arbitrator after which the choice of Chief Justice is final.

Powers of the arbitrator in an arbitration intending

The arbitrator is the one who will give the arbitral award, consequently, The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 provides several powers to him in an effort to decide the award.

Power to manage an oath to the events and witnesses

The arbitrator has the strength to manage the oath to the parties and witnesses. He additionally ought to trouble interrogatories to the events if he idea it important to accomplish that. There is not any specific provision relating to that energy being given under The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1966. However, it’s far implicitly carried out to the reality that he acts like a quasi-judicial authority in arbitration.
Power to take meantime measures

According to Section 17 of this Act, when any celebration throughout the arbitration intending or at any time after making of the arbitral award, may also are trying to find the meantime degree before the arbitration tribunal. The arbitration tribunal has the electricity to take an intervening time measure relating to:

• Appointment of parent for minor or man or woman of unsound thoughts.
• For the safety of: –
1. Interim custody and sale of goods that are subjected to the arbitration agreement.
2. Securing amount that’s disputed inside the arbitration.
3. Detention, prevention or inspection of any assets or aspect which is subjected to arbitration.
4. Appointment of receiver.
5. Such different intervening time degree is important for the eyes of the Court.
Power to proceed to ex-parte

In any arbitration intending, the arbitrator has the energy to proceed to ex-parte i.e. within the prefer of one birthday celebration if any other birthday celebration contravenes any provision of this Act. According to Section 25, there are 3 situations below which the court may additionally bypass an ex- parte award:

1. When the claimant fails to speak his announcement of declare in accordance with Section 23(1) of the Act.
2. When the respondent fails to talk his declaration of declare in accordance with Section 23(1) of the Act.
3. When any celebration fails to appear at an oral listening to or to provide the document or to produce documentary evidence.
The court docket, however, doesn’t proceed ex-parte towards any birthday celebration without giving him the attention regarding the courtroom’s aim to continue ex parte on a selected date, time and location.

Power to rent an expert

According to Section 26 of the Act, the arbitrator has the strength to rent one or greater professionals to document to him on a selected issue, if he unearths it vital in any case. The arbitrator also has the electricity to give the expert any applicable information or documents or belongings for the purpose of his inspection. If important the arbitrator also has the power to appoint the professional as a player in a hearing but with a view to appoint an professional, the professional have to have to expose the parties that he has information in topics associated with this case.

Power to make awards

Power to make awards is the maximum essential electricity as well as the responsibility of arbitrators which is given underneath The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. However, the policies applicable in an arbitration intending is:

• In subjects associated with global industrial arbitration, the arbitral dispute will be decided in keeping with the policies of intending that is determined by way of the events however in the event that they fail to determine it, then the arbitrator himself decides the policies that are relevant.

• In different subjects, the arbitral tribunal shall ought to decide the rule which is according with the sizeable regulation.

However, with such aforesaid strength, on the time of making such an award, the arbitrator additionally has the duty to don’t forget the following necessary components:

• The birthday party who is entitled to expenses.
• The party who pays the price.
• The quantity and technique of determining those costs.
• The way wherein the prices shall be payable.
• The price of the arbitration intending, or some other costs fixed by using the arbitration tribunal. 

If the wide variety of arbitrators is more than one, then the decision must be signed either by using all of the arbitrators or by way of the majority of them.

Duties of an arbitrator in an arbitration

In arbitration, the events may also impose precise obligations at the arbitrator at the time of appointment. The preferred responsibilities which the arbitrator has to fulfil in all types of arbitration are-

Duties to be impartial and independent

Section 12 and Section 18 of The Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 imposed a critical responsibility on the arbitrator that during any arbitration proceeding that he ought to have to be unbiased and independent. By being unbiased it approach that there may be no such non-public or expert courting between the arbitrator or parties which can also have an effect on the very last judgment, but, by using independent, it means that the arbitrator must neither choose nor oppose any party and must provide identical remedy to both parties.

Duty to decide time and area of arbitration

According to Section 20 of this Act, it’s miles the duty of the arbitrator to appoint the time and place of arbitration if the parties have didn’t decide it amongst themselves. But at the time of dedication, the arbitrator has to hold in thoughts the situations inclusive of the benefit of the events. The arbitrator except otherwise agreed by the events, also has the power to decide other locations to hear the witness or expert or to an inspection of documents, items, and different assets.

Duty to disclosure

According to Section 12 of this Act, there is a duty on an arbitrator to disclose all of the relevant records which might be required to be acknowledged by way of each parties at the time of his first come across with them. In the case of Steel Authority of India v. British Marine 2016, the Court said that the arbitrator needs to have to reveal all such data which are probably to affect impartiality, or which may create an appearance of partiality or bias.

Duty to correctly remedy the dispute

The arbitrator should make powerful decisions without doing any misconduct. However, there may be no guiding principle of misconduct this is given below the Act, its scope is to expand by way of case to case. The acts which might be generally considered as misconduct on the parts of the arbitrator are:

• Fails to comply with phrases, that is expressly or impliedly given.
• Making awards that oppose public policy.
• To be bribed or corrupted.
• Breach the guideline of natural justice.

Duty to decide the guideline of process

According to Section 19, the arbitration method isn’t always sure through any code of method. Earlier parties are unfastened to agree at the technique that may be accompanied by using the arbitration tribunal, It continually relies upon the need of the events but in the event that they do not have any earlier settlement on this, then the arbitrator has all the strength to determine the manner for the sort of case. This energy consists of the power to decide the admissibility, relevance, materiality or weight of any proof.

Also Read: Alternative Dispute Resolution under CPC, 1908

Duty to interpret or accurate the award

According to Section 33 of this Act, it’s miles a obligation of the arbitrator to accurate or interpret the award exceeded by himself inside 30 days from the date of receipt:
• A party with notice to every other birthday party may also request arbitration tribunal to accurate any blunders like every typographical, computation, clerical, or another error of similar nature.
• A birthday party with a notice to another celebration may additionally request to interpret any particular part or components of the award.
In this phase, the court docket also may also correct any errors of the award on its personal initiative inside thirty days from the date of the arbitration award.

Case Laws

1. Cheran Properties Ltd. V. Kasturi and Sons Ltd. & Ors. Civil Appeal 10025/2017
While observing the precept enunciated in Chloro Controls that a non-signatory may also be certain by using an arbitration settlement in certain instances, the Court held that the group of businesses doctrine is basically intended to facilitate the success of a at the same time held purpose among the events, in which the circumstances indicate that the motive turned into to bind both signatories and non-signatories. The effort is to discover the authentic essence of the commercial enterprise arrangement and to unravel from a layered shape of business preparations, an purpose to bind a person who is not formally a signatory, but has assumed the responsibility to be bound by means of the actions of a signatory. Non-parties to an Arbitration Agreement cannot be made celebration to an Arbitration, Delhi High Court.

2. R.V. Solutions Pvt. Ltd. V. Ajay Kumar Dixit & Ors. 2019 SCC Online Del 6531 CS Comm 745/2017

The Delhi High Court held that a non-signatory or 0.33 birthday celebration will be subjected to Arbitration without its consent, best in exquisite cases. There wishes to be either an immediate courting to the signatory birthday celebration of the Arbitration Agreement, or commonality of the problem remember, or composite transactions in the agreement among the parties.


These standard powers and duties are important for an arbitrator to behaviour honest arbitration complaints, the arbitrator have to additionally need to draw the checklist upon his particular responsibilities given beneath the settlement. These responsibilities differ from case to case so for each unique case so it’s far very impactful in every case. The guidelines of the committee, propounded at a) divesting the energy of appointment of arbitrators entirely to the arbitral establishments and b) the omission of Clause 6(A) which necessitates a court seized to delve into the existence of an arbitration settlement earlier than progressing with an utility filed below Section 11, does bring with it an detail of uncertainty and ambiguity. The most commonplace trouble in all likelihood to get up will be a celebration challenging the validity of the arbitration agreement as a counterblast to at least one birthday celebration filing an software under Section 11. Explicit rules and suggestions will need to be formed and implemented if the above undertaking is to be deputed to arbitral institutions.

The fame quo is inadequate and suffers from various infirmities. The 2018 Bill does now not mainly detail the scope of the ACI’s position and its powers, which is as an alternative necessary if the ACI is to be entrusted with the obligation of accreditation of establishments so that it will in the end be designated by means of the Supreme Court and the High Court to appoint arbitrators, and can even be ascertaining the lifestyles of a legitimate arbitration settlement (if so provided within the future). Furthermore, the direction of movement to be followed in the event wherein a party is objecting to the validity of the arbitration agreement itself needs to be distinctive. Repeal of Section eleven(6A) of the Act is probable to bring about extra litigation and could rather defeat the intention of expeditiously resolving packages for appointment.

In the absence of any legislative readability at the above factors, fast resolution cannot be ensured. While it’s miles important to decrease intervention of the courts to attain set off and expeditious effects thru arbitration, within the absence of a coherent machine in region, a few quantity of judicial interference is imperative to render a degree of actuality and reduce the wide variety of appeals and challenges springing up out of pre-arbitration decisions. One hopes that the Indian judiciary endeavours to offer the needful readability at the controversies which inundate the instantaneous scenario.


Leave a Comment